ATKINSON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

21 Academy Avenue

Atkinson, New Hampshire 03811

Public Hearing Meeting Town Hall

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Present: William Friel, Vice-Chairman; Sanford Carter; Hank Riehl; Kate Rochford;

Alternates: Maggie Osborn

Mr. Friel called the meeting to order at 7:35P.M.

Approval of Minutes 8/8/07.

The following corrections/additions were made:

Page 2, 4th Paragraph, last line, change "maybe" to "may be ".

Page 3, under criteria: 3, after "move" add "to" and after "garage" add "to".

Page 4, after "is" add "intended" and change "Poner" to "Pomer"

Motion to approve the minutes was made by Ms. Rochford, seconded by Mr. Carter and unanimously approved.

Correspondence:

Incoming

Home Business Application – Christina Brown, 8 Devonshire Road, Map 14, Lot 90. The Board reviewed the application. Based on the application as presented, and no changes having been made, the Board voted unanimously to approve the request.

Ronald MacDonald, Jr. 21 Meditation Lane, Map 8, Lot 114 re: Notes on truck questions. The Board still was not clear on whether there was screening for the vehicles. The Board agreed unanimously to have the applicant appear before the Board for further clarification.

Sumner Kalman dated 8/9/07 re: SBA Towers Inc. v. Atkinson .

Sumner Kalman dated 8/13/07 re: Zannini, Jr. v Town of Atkinson, hearing on remand status.

Big Island Pond to Library Director dated 8/12/07 re: book ‘Landscaping at the Water’s Edge’.

Sumner Kalman dated 8/20/07 re: Zannini v. Town of Atkinson re: Stipulation.

Sumner Kalman to Attorney Campbell dated 8/27/07 re: Zannini, Jr. v. Town of Atkinson.

Planning Board to Mullett Family Trust dated 8/28/07 re: 2 Lot Subdivision approval.

ZBA Budget printout dated 8/31/07.

Lavelle Associates plan dated 8/16/07 for Blake Baker, Map 22, Lot 34.

Sumner Kalman dated 9/6/07 re: Atkinson v Zannini signed Stipulation.

Sumner Kalman dated 9/6/07 re: SBA Towers, Inc. v Atkinson , Answer and Affirmative Defenses.

Conservation Commission dated 9/12/07 re: Baker, 16 Chase Island, Map 22, Lot 34.

Outgoing

Robert Williams dated 8/9/07 re: Home Business Renewal for 45 Sawyer Avenue, Map 3, Lot 68.

ZBA Legal Notice for meeting of 9/12/07.

 

Public Hearing – Continued from August 8th - 8:00 P.M.

Blake & Donna Baker request for Special Exception as specified in the Zoning Ordinance Article VII, Section 700:2 to allow conversion from Seasonal to year-round/primary use for new construction of a dwelling and Variance from Article IV, Section 410:8(b) of the Ordinance to construct a new dwelling 50’ from wetland (Big Island Pond) as opposed to the required 100’ on property located at 16 Chase Island Road, Map 22, Lot 34, RR3 Zone.

Abutters list was read with the following present: Mr. and Mrs. Baker; David Holligan

Mr. Carter explained the Board conducted a site walk. The discussion was relative to the original request to rebuild a dwelling in the same location as is now, requiring a variance to the sideline setbacks. The Board had concerns at the last hearing and thought there was room to move the proposed dwelling over to make it conform to the setback requirement. Mr. Carter believed that based on the topography and the contour of the lot there was the room to pivot the house to meet the requirement. There might be a rock that needs to be moved and there would probably be excavation necessary to put in the frost wall. The contour of the land rises rapidly. Mr. Carter felt that after seeing the site there was no insurmountable hardship that would pertain to the applicant not being able to pivot the house to conform to the sideline setback. Mr. Riehl agreed and so did Ms. Rochford and Mrs. Osborn.

Mrs. Baker said they did just that and presented the Board with a new set of drawings in which the proposed dwelling was 15 feet from the sideline and 50’ from the lake. The dwelling increased to a 30’ x 26’ house as opposed to the original of 30’ x 24’. They are no longer asking for a sideline variance. Mrs. Baker indicated the Conservation Commission held a site walk last week and have submitted a letter of recommendation for the proposal. Mr. Carter asked about the deck. Mr. Baker said there is a proposed deck with a roof and screens but that it is 50’ away from waters edge. The roofline has the same pitch as the original proposal. Mr. Riehl asked about the boathouse and the Bakers said they were not making any changes to it. Mr. Friel asked if any of the members had a problem with the proposed size of the dwelling. Mr. Riehl said this was a half-acre parcel, which is very large for this area. Mr. Carter stated that the house next door is very large. The Board raised questions about the height and determined the Town has always used BOCA standards. This house is three stories on the water side, but two stories from the street side. The board agreed that the Building Inspector would review the drawings for height requirements prior to issuing a permit.

Mr. Friel asked if the septic system location was going to change. The Bakers said they do not know yet, but were told it does not have to go back to the state and will just be an as built change. The leach field location will not change and the septic system will meet all of the setback requirements.

The Board asked for abutter input. Mr. Holligan had no problem with the proposal and thought it was consistent with what was is the area. Mr. Friel read the letter from the Conservation Commission.

The Board reviewed the conditions for the conversion of seasonal to year round use according to Section 700:2

Review by the Health Officer and complies with Section W300 of the Water and Sewerage Disposal System. The septic must be installed before the CO can be issued.

The proposal must meet the conditions of the Shoreline Protection Act. There is a new septic plan that has been approved by the State and signed off by the Town of Atkinson Health Officer.

Mr. Carter made a motion to approve the request of conversion of the use from seasonal to year round based on all of the conditions having been met, and conditional upon the variance being granted. Ms. Rochford seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.

The Board reviewed the criterion for the Variance:

The new dwelling is more conforming. There was a consensus of the Board that this was met.

There is improved sewerage and the septic system is more conforming. There was a consensus of the Board that this was met.

This is the best area for the placement of the new dwelling based on the topography of the Lot. There was a consensus of the Board that this was met.

There was a consensus of the Board that this was met.

The lake is more protected with a new septic system and the placement of the dwelling is more conforming. There was a consensus of the Board that this was met.

Mr. Carter made motion to approve the request for a variance based on all of the criteria having been met, subject to the drawings and amended lot drawings submitted on September 12, 2007, conditioned upon storm water protection in accordance with the Conservation Commissions request of downspouts with drywells. Ms. Rochford seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.

Public Hearing

William & Diane Bingham request for a Special Exception as specified in the Zoning Ordinance Article IV, Section 450 for a Home Business ‘Artemis Bowen, Inc.’ for the purpose of Real Estate Brokerage Service at property located at 9 Amberwood Drive, Map 19, Lot 2-4, RR2 Zone.

Abutter’s list was read with the following present: Mr. and Mrs. Bingham

Mrs. Bingham explained that she originally had a home business approval usage in 1999. She is looking for approval to run a real estate business, which is 100% computer based. She is a licensed Broker in Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire and deals with sellers by listing their homes for sale on MLS Services. A potential buyer would then contact her and she would put them in touch with the Seller. There is no sign for advertising and there are no drop-in clients. Almost everything is done by e-mail or fax. There is no traffic impact because there are no customers. They have occasional deliveries from Staples and UPS. The plan submitted indicated that approximately 13% of the square footage is used for the business. The Board discussed the hours and made sure the applicant was aware that the aggregate of employee’s hours could not be more than eighty. Mrs. Bigham agreed.

The Board reviewed the conditions:

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

The Board agreed this was met.

Ms. Rochford made a motion to approve the request for a home business based on the application presented and all of the conditions having been met and that all of the necessary permits and inspections will be completed. Mrs. Osborn seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved.

Next Zoning Board of Adjustment Hearing scheduled for October 2007

Motion to adjourn was made and seconded. Mr. Friel adjourned the hearing at 9:00 P.M.

 

 

 

Minutes transcribed from tape. Respectfully submitted

Rebecca Russo

Approved________________________